Translating Risk, Need, and Responsivity (RNR) Principles into Supervisory and Clinical Practice

(OT296-A) Training Evaluation – Translating Risk, Need, and Responsivity (RNR) Principles into Supervisory and Clinical Practice

Training Name: Translating Risk, Need, and Responsivity (RNR) Principles into Supervisory and Clinical Practice

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Explain the key principles for effective correctional rehabilitation using the RNR model
2) Describe the empirical research and evidence supporting the RNR model
3) Apply the risk principle to assess, predict, and match intervention intensity to the risk level of those who have offended
4) Distinguish between criminogenic and non-criminogenic needs
5) Identify and address responsivity factors that influence intervention effectiveness
6) Recognize common challenges and considerations in implementing the RNR model

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Sandy Jung, PhD) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability (Sandy Jung, PhD) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Explain the key principles for effective correctional rehabilitation using the RNR model” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Describe the empirical research and evidence supporting the RNR model” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Apply the risk principle to assess, predict, and match intervention intensity to the risk level of those who have offended” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Distinguish between criminogenic and non-criminogenic needs” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Identify and address responsivity factors that influence intervention effectiveness” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.6. Would you agree that learning objective #6 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Recognize common challenges and considerations in implementing the RNR model” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s (Sandy Jung, PhD) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all