Training Evaluation: Using the Good Lives Model with Adolescents and Young Men Who Have Harmed Others

(OT299) Training Evaluation: Using the Good Lives Model with Adolescents and Young Men Who Have Harmed Others

Training Name: Using the Good Lives Model with Adolescents and Young Men Who Have Harmed Others
Presented by: David Prescott, LICSW, ATSA-F
Date: January 13, 2026

Learning Objectives
As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Describe the primary human goods in the Good Lives Model and their role in rehabilitation planning
2) Explain the relationship between identified risk factors and the development of approach-oriented treatment goals
3) Apply approach goals to support effective intervention strategies in clinical practice
4) Identify four common obstacles to achieving one’s good life goals
5) Describe two components of internal motivation that influence behavioral change

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Describe the primary human goods in the Good Lives Model and their role in rehabilitation planning.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Explain the relationship between identified risk factors and the development of approach-oriented treatment goals.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Apply approach goals to support effective intervention strategies in clinical practice.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Identify four common obstacles to achieving one’s good life goals.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Describe two components of internal motivation that influence behavioral change.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all