Training Evaluation: Understanding the Origins of Harmful Sexual Behavior by Adolescents

(OT288-A) Training Evaluation – Understanding the Origins of Harmful Sexual Behavior by Adolescents

Training Name: Understanding the Origins of Harmful Sexual Behavior by Adolescents

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Explain multiple etiological pathways associated with the onset of adolescent sexually abusive behaviors
2) Design intervention programs that address the specific risk and needs of subgroups of adolescents who engage in sexually abusive behavior
3) Identify examples of early life-course prevention, risk assessment, and intervention
4) Describe the benefits and potential harm of social and systems responses to child and adolescent sexual behavior problems

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Tom Leversee, LCSW) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability (Tom Leversee, LCSW) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Explain multiple etiological pathways associated with the onset of adolescent sexually abusive behaviors” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Design intervention programs that address the specific risk and needs of subgroups of adolescents who engage in sexually abusive behavior” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Identify examples of early life-course prevention, risk assessment, and intervention” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Describe the benefits and potential harm of social and systems responses to child and adolescent sexual behavior problems” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s (Tom Leversee, LCSW) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all