Training Evaluation: Testifying in Juvenile Cases: A Neuroscience and Psychosocial Development Framework (OT221-A)


(OT221-A) Evaluation – Testifying in Juvenile Cases: A Neuroscience and Psychosocial Development Framework

Training Name: Testifying in Juvenile Cases: A Neuroscience and Psychosocial Development Framework

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, attendees will be better able to:

1) Explain the behavioral implications of the maturational imbalance between the arousal of the socioemotional system and the full maturation of the cognitive control system.
2) List reasons why juveniles are more likely to take risks and make risky decisions when friends are present.
3) Describe the brain-based maturation associated with a juvenile’s greater capacity for reform.
4) Explain the indicators of psychosocial maturity associated with desistance from antisocial behavior.
5) Describe two types of negative outcomes associated with placing juveniles in adult prisons.

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Tom Leversee, LCSW) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability (Tom Leversee, LCSW) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Explain the behavioral implications of the maturational imbalance between the arousal of the socioemotional system and the full maturation of the cognitive control system.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “List reasons why juveniles are more likely to take risks and make risky decisions when friends are present.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Describe the brain-based maturation associated with a juvenile’s greater capacity for reform.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Explain the indicators of psychosocial maturity associated with desistance from antisocial behavior.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Describe two types of negative outcomes associated with placing juveniles in adult prisons.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s (Tom Leversee, LCSW) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all