Training Evaluation: Surviving the Parkland Mass Shooting: Insights from a Father and Daughter on Advancing Trauma Recovery (NOT143-A )

(NOT143-A ) Evaluation: Surviving the Parkland Mass Shooting: Insights from a Father and Daughter on Advancing Trauma Recovery

Training Name: Surviving the Parkland Mass Shooting: Insights from a Father and Daughter on Advancing Trauma Recovery

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Describe challenges and concerns when offering mental health crisis response and support services to students in the aftermath of a catastrophic event
2) Explain the need for support in the planning for resources and for the implementation of productive, successful, and supportive interventions following periods of crisis
3) Improve mental health intervention outcomes for students following periods of crisis

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all
4. How useful was the content of this program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the first instructor’s (David M. Feldman, PhD) knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.2. Rate the second instructor’s (Olivia L. Feldman) knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.1. Rate the first instructor’s (David M. Feldman, PhD) teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.2. Rate the second instructor’s (Olivia L. Feldman) teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
8. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
9. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
10. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
11. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all