Training Evaluation: Returning to the Heart of the Work

(NOT139) Training Evaluation: Returning to the Heart of the Work

Training Name: Returning to the Heart of the Work: Sustaining Your Motivational Interviewing Spirit and Values
Presented by: Sarah Cameron, MS, CTTS, NBC-HWC and Annabys Jordan
Date: March 6, 2026

Learning Objectives
As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Identify their own core values and explore how these values connect to their work.
2) Explain the four components of MI Spirit (Partnership, Acceptance, Compassion, and Empowerment) as aspirational directions rather than fixed ideals and apply them to challenging scenarios.
3) Use structured self-inquiry tools and integrate micro-practices to identify areas of strength, opportunities for growth, and ways to sustain MI Spirit in daily work..

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all
4. How useful was the content of this program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5.1. Rate the first instructor’s (Sarah Cameron) knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.2. Rate the second instructor’s (Annabys Jordan) knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.1. Rate the first instructor’s (Sarah Cameron) teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.2. Rate the second instructor’s (Annabys Jordan) teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
8. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
9. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
10. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
11. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all