Training Evaluation: Providing Treatment to Minor-Attracted People

(OT252-A) Evaluation – Providing Treatment to Minor-Attracted People

Training Name: Providing Treatment to Minor-Attracted People

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Explain how stigma, social norms, and moral panic influence the access of minor-attracted people (MAPs) to mental health treatments.
2) Describe four primary barriers that treaters face in providing service provisions.
3) Analyze research-based knowledge and compare it to current practices.

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Kristin Spooner, DSW, LICSW, CST) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability (Kristin Spooner, DSW, LICSW, CST) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Explain how stigma, social norms, and moral panic influence the access of minor-attracted people (MAPs) to mental health treatments.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Describe four primary barriers that treaters face in providing service provisions.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Analyze research-based knowledge and compare it to current practices.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s (Kristin Spooner, DSW, LICSW, CST) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all