Training Evaluation: ODARA Training: Development, Scoring, and Interpretation of the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment

(OT273-A) Evaluation – ODARA Training: Development, Scoring, and Interpretation of the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment

Training Name: ODARA Training: Development, Scoring, and Interpretation of the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Describe the empirical research supporting the ODARA’s development and validity
2) Demonstrate foundational knowledge of the ODARA scoring process
3) Describe the ODARA in the context of the principles of risk, need, and responsivity
4) Explain possible contexts in which the ODARA can be used, including policing, courts, and correctional services

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5.1. Rate the first instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (N. Zoe Hilton, PhD, CPsych) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.2. Rate the second instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Katie Gotch, LPC, CCSOT, ATSA-F) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.1. Rate the first instructor’s teaching ability (N. Zoe Hilton, PhD, CPsych) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.2. Rate the second instructor’s teaching ability (Katie Gotch, LPC, CCSOT, ATSA-F) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “1) Describe the empirical research supporting the ODARA’s development and validity” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “2) Demonstrate foundational knowledge of the ODARA scoring process” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “3) Describe the ODARA in the context of the principles of risk, need, and responsivity” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “4) Explain possible contexts in which the ODARA can be used, including policing, courts, and correctional services” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13.1. Rate the first instructor’s (N. Zoe Hilton, PhD, CPsych) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
13.2. Rate the second instructor’s (Katie Gotch, LPC, CCSOT, ATSA-F) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all