Training Evaluation: Navigating the Challenges of Supervising Professionals Treating Sexual Aggression


(OT258-A) Evaluation – Navigating the Challenges of Supervising Professionals Treating Sexual Aggression

Training Name: Navigating the Challenges of Supervising Professionals Treating Sexual Aggression

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Describe common supervisory themes when working with people who have sexually abused
2) Elicit supervisee feedback to keep supervision on track
3) Use motivational interviewing skills to explore and resolve supervisee ambivalence
4) Use the stages of change model can be employed in clinical supervision
5) Explain how to stay focused on the goal of client change and avoid collusion with frustrated clinicians

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5.1. Rate the first instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Shoshanna Must, PhD) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.2. Rate the second instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (David Prescott, LICSW, ATSA-F) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.1. Rate the first instructor’s teaching ability (Shoshanna Must, PhD) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.2. Rate the second instructor’s teaching ability (David Prescott, LICSW, ATSA-F) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Describe common supervisory themes when working with people who have sexually abused” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Elicit supervisee feedback to keep supervision on track” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Use motivational interviewing skills to explore and resolve supervisee ambivalence” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Use the stages of change model can be employed in clinical supervision” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Explain how to stay focused on the goal of client change and avoid collusion with frustrated clinicians” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13.1. Rate the first instructor’s (Shoshanna Must, PhD) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
13.2. Rate the second instructor’s (David Prescott, LICSW, ATSA-F) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all