Training Evaluation: How to Effectively Use Dynamic Risk Assessment Tools: STABLE-2007 & ACUTE-2007 Training

(OT266) Training Evaluation: How to Effectively Use Dynamic Risk Assessment Tools: STABLE-2007 & ACUTE-2007 Training

Training Name: Static-99R Training: Best Practices for Accurate Risk Assessment

Date: May 8th – May 9th, 2025

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Describe the development and research supporting the STABLE-2007 and ACUTE-2007 tools.
2) Identify the seven risk factors assessed by ACUTE-2007 and their implications for imminent sexual re-offense risk.
3) Explain the dynamic risk factors measured by STABLE-2007 and their relevance to criminogenic needs.
4) Demonstrate accurate scoring of items on the STABLE-2007 and ACUTE-2007 assessment tools.
5) Interpret the results of STABLE-2007 and ACUTE-2007 within behavioral health, correctional, and court settings.
6) Apply recent guidance on using these tools with individuals convicted of child sexual abuse material (CSAM)-related offenses.
7) Analyze case studies to practice administering the measures and avoiding common scoring errors.
8) Evaluate how combining dynamic risk assessments with Static-99R enhances sexual recidivism risk predictions.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Describe the development and research supporting the STABLE-2007 and ACUTE-2007 tools.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Identify the seven risk factors assessed by ACUTE-2007 and their implications for imminent sexual re-offense risk.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Explain the dynamic risk factors measured by STABLE-2007 and their relevance to criminogenic needs.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Demonstrate accurate scoring of items on the STABLE-2007 and ACUTE-2007 assessment tools.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Interpret the results of STABLE-2007 and ACUTE-2007 within behavioral health, correctional, and court settings.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.6. Would you agree that learning objective #6 was met?
Learning Objective #6: “Apply recent guidance on using these tools with individuals convicted of child sexual abuse material (CSAM)-related offenses.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.7. Would you agree that learning objective #7 was met?
Learning Objective #7: “Analyze case studies to practice administering the measures and avoiding common scoring errors.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.8. Would you agree that learning objective #8 was met?
Learning Objective #8: “Evaluate how combining dynamic risk assessments with Static-99R enhances sexual recidivism risk predictions.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all