Training Evaluation: How to Conduct Effective Risk Assessment Interviews

(OT269-A) Evaluation – How to Conduct Effective Risk Assessment Interviews

Training Name: How to Conduct Effective Risk Assessment Interviews

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Identify three effective interview techniques for performing psychosexual evaluations
2) Describe risk and protective information obtained through interviews
3) Analyze interview responses to use risk assessment measures more efficiently
4) Explain four characteristics of an effective interviewer

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5.1. Rate the first instructor’s (Amy Griffith, PhD, LP) knowledge and expertise of the subject 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.2. Rate the second instructor’s (Seth Wescott, LMLP, ATSA-F) knowledge and expertise of the subject 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.1. Rate the first instructor’s (Amy Griffith, PhD, LP) teaching ability 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.2. Rate the second instructor’s (Seth Wescott, LMLP, ATSA-F) teaching ability 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Identify three effective interview techniques for performing psychosexual evaluations” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Describe risk and protective information obtained through interviews ” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Analyze interview responses to use risk assessment measures more efficiently ” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Explain four characteristics of an effective interviewer ” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13.1. Rate the first instructor’s (Amy Griffith, PhD, LP) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
13.2. Rate the second instructor’s (Seth Wescott, LMLP, ATSA-F) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all