Training Evaluation: How to Align Treatment Programs with Best Practices (OT238-A)


(OT238-A) Evaluation – How to Align Treatment Programs with Best Practices

Course Name: How to Align Treatment Programs with Best Practices

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Weigh the evidence for the effectiveness of treatment for sexual offending.
2) Explain the major characteristics of effective programs.
3) Describe key program evaluation models and resources.
4) Identify areas in which their program should align with best practices.
5) Write evaluations to ensure that the services provided have the desired effect.
6) Develop a working plan to better align their program with best practices.

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Robert McGrath) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability (Robert McGrath) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Weigh the evidence for the effectiveness of treatment for sexual offending.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Explain the major characteristics of effective programs.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Describe key program evaluation models and resources.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Identify areas in which their program should align with best practices.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Write evaluations to ensure that the services provided have the desired effect.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.6. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: ” Develop a working plan to better align their program with best practices.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s (Robert McGrath) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all