Training Evaluation: Groups that Welcome and Engage

(OT301) Training Evaluation: Groups that Welcome and Engage

Training Name: Groups that Welcome and Engage: Integrating Motivational Interviewing into Effective Group Facilitation
Presented by: Kristin Dempsey and Ali Hall
Date: February 2, 2026

Learning Objectives
As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Identify phases of group development
2) Explain methods for helping clients to stay on task in group
3) Determine how best to start the change process
4) Describe motivational interviewing’s use in structuring group therapy

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5.1 Rate the first instructor’s (Kristin Dempsey) knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.2 Rate the second instructor’s (Ali Hall) knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.1 Rate the first instructor’s (Kristin Dempsey) teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.2 Rate the second instructor’s (Ali Hall) teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Identify phases of group development.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Explain methods for helping clients to stay on task in group.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Determine how best to start the change process.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Describe motivational interviewing’s use in structuring group therapy.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all