Training Evaluation: Getting Started in the Field of Sexual Abuse Prevention

(OT317) Training Evaluation: Getting Started in the Field of Sexual Abuse Prevention

Training Name: Getting Started in the Field of Sexual Abuse Prevention
Presented by: David Prescott, LICSW, ATSA-F, Katie Gotch, LPC, CCSOT, ATSA-F, and Seth Wescott, LMLP, ATSA-F
Date: September 18, 2026

Learning Objectives
As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Identify effective models and methods for working with clients to prevent further abuse
2) Describe key elements of best practices when working with individuals who have caused harm
3) Explain the qualities and practices that support effectiveness and growth in this field
4) Identify strategies for self-care and workplace safety

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5.1 Rate the first instructor’s (David Prescott) knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.2 Rate the second instructor’s (Katie Gotch) knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.3 Rate the third instructor’s (Seth Wescott) knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.1 Rate the first instructor’s (David Prescott) teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.2 Rate the second instructor’s (Katie Gotch) teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.3 Rate the third instructor’s (Seth Wescott) teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Identify effective models and methods for working with clients to prevent further abuse.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Describe key elements of best practices when working with individuals who have caused harm.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Explain the qualities and practices that support effectiveness and growth in this field.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Identify strategies for self-care and workplace safety.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all