Training Evaluation: Exploring Cultural Competence in Forensic Practice: What Can We Learn from Evaluations and Treatment with Myanmar Refugees?


(NOT113-A) Evaluation – Exploring Cultural Competence in Forensic Practice: What Can We Learn from Evaluations and Treatment with Myanmar Refugees?

Training Name: Exploring Cultural Competence in Forensic Practice: What Can We Learn from Evaluations and Treatment with Myanmar Refugees?

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Describe common stressors experienced by individuals who have resettled in a new country, with a particular focus on Myanmar Refugees.
2) Explain how cultural scripts influence perceptions of mental disorders and shape narratives of distress.
3) Understand the concept of “trauma of uncertainty” and its impact on refugee populations.
4) Recognize the importance of understanding trauma narratives within the cultural context of clients.
5) Develop strategies for conducting culturally sensitive forensic evaluations and incorporating cultural competence in treatment settings, including with refugees.

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5.1. Rate the first instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Gangaw Zaw, PhD) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.2. Rate the second instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Shoba Sreenivasan) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.1. Rate the first instructor’s teaching ability (Gangaw Zaw, PhD) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.2. Rate the second instructor’s teaching ability (Shoba Sreenivasan) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
8. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
9. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
11. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all