Training Evaluation: Evidenced-Based Community Supervision of Individuals Convicted of Sexual Crimes: Applying RNR and Trauma-Informed Principles in Your Practice


(OT248-A) Evaluation – Evidenced-Based Community Supervision of Individuals Convicted of Sexual Crimes: Applying RNR and Trauma-Informed Principles in Your Practice

Training Name: Evidenced-Based Community Supervision of Individuals Convicted of Sexual Crimes: Applying RNR and Trauma-Informed Principles in Your Practice

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) List the primary components of the RNR model and how RNR can assist with maximizing supervision practices and client success.
2) Define trauma-informed care (TIC) and identify why it is important for correctional populations.
3) Describe two strategies to use with teams of professionals in order to determine the most effective approaches.
4) Design individualized case plans based upon each client’s identified risk/need factors.
5) Make actuarially-based risk assessment adjustments based on time free in the community.

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5.1. Rate the first instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Katie Gotch, LPC, CCSOT, ATSA-F) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.2. Rate the second instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Valerie Gonsalves, PhD., MLS, ATSAF) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.1. Rate the first instructor’s teaching ability (Katie Gotch, LPC, CCSOT, ATSA-F) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.2. Rate the second instructor’s teaching ability (Valerie Gonsalves, PhD., MLS, ATSAF) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “List the primary components of the RNR model and how RNR can assist with maximizing supervision practices and client success.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Define trauma-informed care (TIC) and identify why it is important for correctional populations.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Describe two strategies to use with teams of professionals in order to determine the most effective approaches.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Design individualized case plans based upon each client’s identified risk/need factors.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Evaluate actuarially-based risk assessment adjustments based on time free in the community” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13.1. Rate the first instructor’s (Katie Gotch, LPC, CCSOT, ATSA-F) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
13.2. Rate the second instructor’s (Valerie Gonsalves, PhD., MLS, ATSAF) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all