Training Evaluation: Evidence-Informed Practices for Addressing Juvenile Sexual Offenses (OT255) Training Evaluation: Evidence-Informed Practices for Addressing Juvenile Sexual Offenses Training Name: Evidence-Informed Practices for Addressing Juvenile Sexual Offenses Date: November 8, 2024 Learning Objectives As a result of this training, participants will be able to: 1) Identify the distinctions between sexual and nonsexual recidivism to enhance intervention strategies. 2) Discover how adolescent brain development impacts harmful behaviors and informs prevention efforts. 3) Identify two assessment tools specific to adolescents who have sexually abused. 4) Analyze two treatment approaches designed to support the rehabilitation of adolescents who have sexually abused. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ You have the option to remain anonymous. Please select your preference below: * Include name and email addressRemain anonymous Email * Last Name (as you’d like printed on your certificate) * First Name (as you’d like printed on your certificate) * License Number, if applicable (for identity verification purposes) Issuing state/province, if applicable Which of the following best describes you? * Select OnePsychologistSocial WorkerCounselorStudentNone of the above I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate. * I agree 1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little * 5 4 3 2 1 2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all * 5 4 3 2 1 4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all * 5 4 3 2 1 5.1. Rate the first instructor’s (Norbert Ralph) knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 5.2. Rate the second instructor’s (Mikaela Vidmar) knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 6.1. Rate the first instructor’s (Norbert Ralph) teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 6.2. Rate the second instructor’s (Mikaela Vidmar) teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met? Learning Objective #1: “Identify the distinctions between sexual and nonsexual recidivism to enhance intervention strategies.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met? Learning Objective #2: “Discover how adolescent brain development impacts harmful behaviors and informs prevention efforts.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met? Learning Objective #3: “Identify two assessment tools specific to adolescents who have sexually abused.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met? Learning Objective #4: “Analyze two treatment approaches designed to support the rehabilitation of adolescents who have sexually abused..” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all * 5 4 3 2 1 9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all * 5 4 3 2 1 N/A 12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult * 5 4 3 2 1 13. Rate the instructors’ responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all * 5 4 3 2 1 14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all * 5 4 3 2 1 15. How will the information from this program be useful to you in the future? * 16. What did the program (or presenter/s) do particularly well that helped you understand the material? * 17. What, if anything, could the program (or presenter/s) have done differently to help you understand the material better? * 18. About how long did it take you to complete this course (including completing this form)? * 19. OPTIONAL: How did you learn about this training? 20. OPTIONAL: Do you have any additional thoughts or comments you’d like to share with us? Submit If you are human, leave this field blank. Δ