Training Evaluation: Ethical Decision-Making in Treating Adolescents with Harmful Sexual Behaviors

(OT287-A) Training Evaluation – Ethical Decision-Making in Treating Adolescents with Harmful Sexual Behaviors

Training Name: Ethical Decision-Making in Treating Adolescents with Harmful Sexual Behaviors

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Analyze ethical dilemmas involving confidentiality and public safety.
2) Evaluate approaches for sustaining informed consent and professional boundaries in court-mandated or challenging clinical circumstances.
3) Describe how the different goals of treatment programs and the legal system can create ethical dilemmas.
4) Apply an ethical decision-making framework to navigate clinical situations, including those involving disclosure, dual relationships, and treatment within the type of system that limits client autonomy.

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Amanda L. Pryor, MSW, LCSW, CSAYC, ATSA-F) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability (Amanda L. Pryor, MSW, LCSW, CSAYC, ATSA-F) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Analyze ethical dilemmas involving confidentiality and public safety.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Evaluate approaches for sustaining informed consent and professional boundaries in court-mandated or challenging clinical circumstances.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Describe how the different goals of treatment programs and the legal system can create ethical dilemmas. ” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Apply an ethical decision-making framework to navigate clinical situations, including those involving disclosure, dual relationships, and treatment within the type of system that limits client autonomy.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s (Amanda L. Pryor, MSW, LCSW, CSAYC, ATSA-F) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all