Training Evaluation: Ethical Considerations in Working with People with Trauma and Adversity (OT275)

(OT275) Training Evaluation: Ethical Considerations in Working with People with Trauma and Adversity

Training Name: Ethical Considerations in Working with People with Trauma and Adversity

Date: June 25, 2025

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Explain the connection between past adverse experiences and re-offense risk.
2) Integrate strategies into treatment to ensure ethical practice and enhance client engagement.
3) Identify and describe common ethical dilemmas in working with individuals who have both harmed others and experienced harm themselves.
4) Summarize ethical dilemmas that commonly arise in professional practice, particularly with clients who have abused others and who have been abused.
5) Apply well-established protocols for resolving ethical dilemmas.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Explain the connection between past adverse experiences and re-offense risk.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Integrate strategies into treatment to ensure ethical practice and enhance client engagement.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Identify and describe common ethical dilemmas in working with individuals who have both harmed others and experienced harm themselves.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Summarize ethical dilemmas that commonly arise in professional practice, particularly with clients who have abused others and who have been abused.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Apply well-established protocols for resolving ethical dilemmas.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all