Training Evaluation: Conducting Forensic Evaluation Interviews

(OT303) Training Evaluation: Conducting Forensic Evaluation Interviews

Training Name: Conducting Forensic Evaluation Interviews
Presented by: Amy Griffith, PhD, LP and Seth Wescott, LMLP, ATSA-F
Date: March 24, 2026

Learning Objectives
As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Identify three effective interview techniques for performing forensic evaluations
2) Describe relevant information obtained through interviews
3) Analyze interview responses to use assessment measures more efficiently
4) Explain four characteristics of an effective interviewer

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5.1 Rate the first instructor’s (Amy Griffith) knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.2 Rate the second instructor’s (Seth Wescott) knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.1 Rate the first instructor’s (Amy Griffith) teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.2 Rate the second instructor’s (Seth Wescott) teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Identify three effective interview techniques for performing forensic evaluations.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Describe relevant information obtained through interviews.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Analyze interview responses to use assessment measures more efficiently.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Explain four characteristics of an effective interviewer.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all