Training Evaluation: Clarification Processes in Sibling Sexual Abuse: Ethical Decision-making and Best Practices

(OT242-A) Evaluation – Clarification Processes in Sibling Sexual Abuse: Ethical Decision-making and Best Practices

Training Name: Clarification Processes in Sibling Sexual Abuse: Ethical Decision-making and Best Practices

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Describe what clarification processes involve.
2) Explain the components necessary for safe and effective clarification processes.
3) Describe best practices for conducting clarification sessions.
4) Identify solutions to ethical conflicts when they arise within the clarification process.

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Amanda L. Pryor, MSW, LCSW, CSAYC, ATSA-F) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability (Amanda L. Pryor, MSW, LCSW, CSAYC, ATSA-F) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Describe what clarification processes involve.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Explain the components necessary for safe and effective clarification processes.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Describe best practices for conducting clarification sessions.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Identify solutions to ethical conflicts when they arise within the clarification process. ” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s (Amanda L. Pryor, MSW, LCSW, CSAYC, ATSA-F) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all