Training Evaluation: Circles of Support & Accountability

(OT180-A) Evaluation – Circles of Support & Accountability: Involving the Community in Sexual Violence Prevention (OT180-A)

Training Name: Circles of Support & Accountability: Involving the Community in Sexual Violence Prevention

Learning Objectives

As a result of participating in this training, participants will be better able to:
1) Describe the role of restorative justice in sexual violence prevention.
2) Explain the origins of the CoSA model, including project structure, volunteer recruitment and training, and project implementation.
3) Analyze the relative contributions of professionals and nonprofessionals in sexual violence prevention.
4) Describe the CoSA research base outlining both qualitative and quantitative outcomes.
5) Construct feasibility analyses of establishing a CoSA project in their own jurisdictions.

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Robin Wilson, PhD, ABPP) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability (Robin Wilson, PhD, ABPP) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Describe the role of restorative justice in sexual violence prevention.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Explain the origins of the CoSA model, including project structure, volunteer recruitment and training, and project implementation.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Analyze the relative contributions of professionals and nonprofessionals in sexual violence prevention.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Describe the CoSA research base outlining both qualitative and quantitative outcomes.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Construct feasibility analyses of establishing a CoSA project in their own jurisdictions.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the presenters (Robin Wilson, PhD, ABPP) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all