Training Evaluation: Child-to-Parent Abuse: Using Solution-Focused and Trauma-Informed Principles to Support Family Safety and Healing

NOT145 Training Evaluation: Child-to-Parent Abuse: Using Solution-Focused and Trauma-Informed Principles to Support Family Safety and Healing

Training Name: Child-to-Parent Abuse: Using Solution-Focused and Trauma-Informed Principles to Support Family Safety and Healing
Presented by: Ayse Adil and Joseph Lettieri, BEM
Date: September 11, 2026

Learning Objectives
As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1)1) Explain different forms of child-to-parent abuse and the factors that can contribute to it, including family violence and related trauma, neurodivergence, and wider systemic influences.
2) Apply solution-focused and trauma-informed principles to engage children, parents, and families to promote safety, collaboration, and hope.
3) Describe practical strategies and questioning techniques that reduce blame, build on strengths and support meaningful change
4) Identify approaches that improve assessment, intervention and multi agency practice.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all
4. How useful was the content of this program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5.1. Rate the first instructor’s (Ayse Adil) knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.2. Rate the second instructor’s (Joseph Lettieri) knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.1. Rate the first instructor’s (Ayse Adil) teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.2. Rate the second instructor’s (Joseph Lettieri) teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
8. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
9. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
10. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
11. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all