Training Evaluation: Change Talk – Hopes and Dreams: Mastering Empathic Listening and Compassionate Practice (Module 03) (NOT115-03-A)

(NOT115-03-A) Change Talk – Hopes and Dreams: Mastering Empathic Listening and Compassionate Practice (Module 03)

Training Name: Change Talk – Hopes and Dreams: Mastering Empathic Listening and Compassionate Practice (Module 03)

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Identify “change talk” within a person’s statements
2) Provide a crisp empathic summary statement collecting change talk with a closing inquiry/ open question
3) Describe three components of the “trauma whisper”
4) Explain three components of shame
5) Explain the difference between change talk, commitment talk, and sustain talk

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all
4. How useful was the content of this program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the first instructor’s (Stephen R. Andrew LCSW, LADC, CCS, CGP) knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s (Stephen R. Andrew LCSW, LADC, CCS, CGP) teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
8. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
9. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
10. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
11. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all