Training Evaluation: Building Healthier Workplace Cultures Through Empathic Leadership (OT302-A) Training Evaluation – Building Healthier Workplace Cultures Through Empathic Leadership Training Name: Building Healthier Workplace Cultures Through Empathic Leadership Learning Objectives As a result of this training, participants will be able to: 1) Define empathic leadership and describe its significance in fostering positive workplace environments, specifically in relation to team dynamics and communication 2) Apply trauma-informed principles to everyday supervisory and team interactions 3) Demonstrate practical skills in validating team members’ emotions and experiences 4) Apply key teamwork skills such as cooperation, assertiveness, and effective communication that contribute to overall team functionality, fostering an environment of collaboration 5) Describe strategies for effectively resolving conflicts within their teams by promoting open dialogue If you seek psychology credit you have the option to remain anonymous. If you seek social work credit you must provide your contact information. Please select your preference below: * Include name and email addressRemain anonymous Email * Last Name (as you’d like printed on your certificate) * First Name (as you’d like printed on your certificate) * License Number, if applicable (for identity verification purposes) Issuing state/province, if applicable Which of the following best describes you? * Select OnePsychologistSocial WorkerCounselorStudentNone of the above I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate. * I agree 1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little * 5 4 3 2 1 2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all * 5 4 3 2 1 5.1. Rate the first instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Anette Birgersson) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 5.2. Rate the second instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Christin Santiago, CTRS) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 6.1. Rate the first instructor’s teaching ability (Anette Birgersson) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 6.2. Rate the second instructor’s teaching ability (Christin Santiago, CTRS) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met? Learning Objective #1: “Define empathic leadership and describe its significance in fostering positive workplace environments, specifically in relation to team dynamics and communication” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met? Learning Objective #2: “Apply trauma-informed principles to everyday supervisory and team interactions” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met? Learning Objective #3: “Demonstrate practical skills in validating team members’ emotions and experiences” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met? Learning Objective #4: “Apply key teamwork skills such as cooperation, assertiveness, and effective communication that contribute to overall team functionality, fostering an environment of collaboration” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met? Learning Objective #5: “Describe strategies for effectively resolving conflicts within their teams by promoting open dialogue” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all * 5 4 3 2 1 9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 N/A 12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult * 5 4 3 2 1 13.1. Rate the first instructor’s (Anette Birgersson) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive* * 5 4 3 2 1 N/A 13.2. Rate the second instructor’s (Christin Santiago, CTRS) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive* * 5 4 3 2 1 N/A 14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all * 5 4 3 2 1 15. How will the information from this program be useful to you in the future? * 16. What did the program (or presenter/s) do particularly well that helped you understand the material? * 17. What, if anything, could the program (or presenter/s) have done differently to help you understand the material better? * 18. About how long did it take you to complete this course (including completing this form)? * 19. OPTIONAL: How did you learn about this training? 20. OPTIONAL: Do you have any additional thoughts or comments you’d like to share with us? Submit If you are human, leave this field blank. Δ