Training Evaluation: Building Culturally Competent Assessment and Treatment


(OT249-A) Evaluation – Building Culturally Competent Assessment and Treatment

Training Name: Building Culturally Competent Assessment and Treatment

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Examine the rationale for culturally specific assessment tools in forensic settings.
2) Recognize IRCAs as structured professional judgment assessments that focus on client experience of racism and racial trauma.
3) Identify the difference between the DSM’s Cultural Formulation Interview and IRCAs.
4) Explain how race is a substantive factor in their assessment and treatment planning for clients in their work with individuals convicted of crimes.

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Robert S. Wright, MSW, RSW) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability (Robert S. Wright, MSW, RSW) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Examine the rationale for culturally specific assessment tools in forensic settings.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Recognize IRCAs as structured professional judgment assessments that focus on client experience of racism and racial trauma.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Identify the difference between the DSM’s Cultural Formulation Interview and IRCAs.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Explain how race is a substantive factor in their assessment and treatment planning for clients in their work with individuals convicted of crimes.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s (Robert S. Wright, MSW, RSW) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all