Training Evaluation: Blending Motivational Interviewing Skills with Solution-Focused Brief Therapy: Skills for Creating Lasting Change

(NOT114-A) Evaluation – Blending Motivational Interviewing Skills with Solution-Focused Brief Therapy: Skills for Creating Lasting Change

Training Name: Blending Motivational Interviewing Skills with Solution-Focused Brief Therapy: Skills for Creating Lasting Change

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Understand the key principles and techniques of SFBT and how they can be integrated with MI.
2) Apply SFBT and MI techniques to provide an effective therapeutic experience.
3) Recognize the similarities and differences between MI and SFBT, and how their integration can lead to positive client outcomes in fewer sessions.
4) Demonstrate an understanding of the research supporting the effectiveness of SFBT and MI in creating lasting change for a wide range of client issues.

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Dee-Dee Stout) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability (Dee-Dee Stout) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Understand the key principles and techniques of SFBT and how they can be integrated with MI.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Apply SFBT and MI techniques to provide an effective therapeutic experience.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Recognize the similarities and differences between MI and SFBT, and how their integration can lead to positive client outcomes in fewer sessions.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
loag7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Demonstrate an understanding of the research supporting the effectiveness of SFBT and MI in creating lasting change for a wide range of client issues.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s (Dee-Dee Stout) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all