Training Evaluation: Beyond Motivational Interviewing: Mastering Empathic Listening and Compassionate Practice (Module 04) (NOT115-04-A)

(NOT115-04-A) Evaluation – Beyond Motivational Interviewing: Mastering Empathic Listening and Compassionate Practice (Module 04)

Training Name: Beyond Motivational Interviewing: Mastering Empathic Listening and Compassionate Practice (Module 04)

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Develop advanced strategies to deepen MI practice and foster continuous skill improvement.
2) Discover techniques to engage both emotional intelligence (heart) and cognitive skills (mind) for a more authentic and effective MI approach.
3) Apply MI skills in real-world interactions.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all
4. How useful was the content of this program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s (Stephen R. Andrew LCSW, LADC, CCS, CGP) knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s (Stephen R. Andrew LCSW, LADC, CCS, CGP) teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
8. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
9. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
10. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
11. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all