Training Evaluation: Best Practices in Treatment Planning for Adults Who Have Sexually Abused


(NOT121-A) Training Evaluation – Best Practices in Treatment Planning for Adults Who Have Sexually Abused

Training Name: Best Practices in Treatment Planning for Adults Who Have Sexually Abused

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Explain the role of treatment planning in interventions with people who have sexually abused.
2) Describe how dynamic risk assessment can inform treatment plans.
3) Create treatment plans using approach goals.
4) Recognize how trauma and adversity create treatment needs that can be addressed in treatment, whether through trauma treatment or trauma-informed care.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all
4. How useful was the content of this program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5.1. Rate the first instructor’s (Katie Gotch, LPC, CCSOT, ATSA-F) knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.2. Rate the second instructor’s (Seth Wescott, LMLP, ATSA-F) knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.3. Rate the third instructor’s (David Prescott, LICSW, ATSA-F) knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.1. Rate the first instructor’s (Katie Gotch, LPC, CCSOT, ATSA-F) teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.2. Rate the second instructor’s (Seth Wescott, LMLP, ATSA-F) teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.2. Rate the third instructor’s (David Prescott, LICSW, ATSA-F) teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
8. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
9. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
10. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
11. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all