Training Evaluation: Best Practices in Treatment Planning for Adolescents Who Have Sexually Abused

(OT267-A) Evaluation – Best Practices in Treatment Planning for Adolescents Who Have Sexually Abused

Training Name: Best Practices in Treatment Planning for Adolescents Who Have Sexually Abused

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Explain the role of treatment planning in interventions with adolescents who have harmed others.
2) Describe how understanding both risk and needs can inform adolescents’ treatment plans.
3) Create treatment plans for adolescents using approach goals.
4) Recognize how trauma and adversity create treatment needs that can be addressed in treatment, whether through trauma treatment or trauma-informed care.

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5.1. Rate the first instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Katie Gotch, LPC, CCSOT, ATSA-F) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.2. Rate the second instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Seth Wescott, LMLP, ATSA-F) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.3. Rate the third instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (David Prescott, LICSW, ATSA-F) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.1. Rate the first instructor’s teaching ability (Katie Gotch, LPC, CCSOT, ATSA-F) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.2. Rate the second instructor’s teaching ability (Seth Wescott, LMLP, ATSA-F) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.3. Rate the third instructor’s teaching ability (David Prescott, LICSW, ATSA-F) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “1) Explain the role of treatment planning in interventions with adolescents who have harmed others.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “2) Describe how understanding both risk and needs can inform adolescents’ treatment plans.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “3) Create treatment plans for adolescents using approach goals.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “4) Recognize how trauma and adversity create treatment needs that can be addressed in treatment, whether through trauma treatment or trauma-informed care.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13.1. Rate the first instructor’s (Katie Gotch, LPC, CCSOT, ATSA-F) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
13.2. Rate the second instructor’s (Seth Wescott, LMLP, ATSA-F) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
13.3. Rate the third instructor’s (David Prescott, LICSW, ATSA-F) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all