Training Evaluation: Assessing and Treating Emerging Adults Who Have Sexually Abused: Navigating the Boundary Between Adolescence and Adulthood

(OT290-A) Training Evaluation – Assessing and Treating Emerging Adults Who Have Sexually Abused: Navigating the Boundary Between Adolescence and Adulthood

Training Name: Assessing and Treating Emerging Adults Who Have Sexually Abused: Navigating the Boundary Between Adolescence and Adulthood

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Identify the characteristics of an emerging adult
2) Describe the unique similarities and differences between juveniles, emerging adults, and adult offending populations
3) Identify assessment techniques for mitigating an emerging adult’s risk for sexual harm
4) Plan ways to meet each client’s needs by integrating assessment and treatment approaches
5) Demonstrate treatment interventions to meet the individual needs of emerging adults

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5.1. Rate the first instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Candice Waltrip, PsyD) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.2. Rate the second instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Michele Leslie, PsyD) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.1. Rate the first instructor’s teaching ability (Candice Waltrip, PsyD) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.2. Rate the second instructor’s teaching ability (Michele Leslie, PsyD) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Identify the characteristics of an emerging adult” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Describe the unique similarities and differences between juveniles, emerging adults, and adult offending populations” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Identify assessment techniques for mitigating an emerging adult’s risk for sexual harm” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Plan ways to meet each client’s needs by integrating assessment and treatment approaches” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Demonstrate treatment interventions to meet the individual needs of emerging adults” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13.1. Rate the first instructor’s (Candice Waltrip, PsyD) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
13.2. Rate the second instructor’s (Michele Leslie, PsyD) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all