Training Evaluation: Assessing Adolescents with Sexually Abusive Behaviors

(OT261-A) Evaluation – Assessing Adolescents with Sexually Abusive Behaviors

Training Name: Assessing Adolescents with Sexually Abusive Behaviors

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Analyze contemporary approaches to assessing sexual risk among juveniles
2) Evaluate the strengths and limitations inherent in the risk assessment process
3) Describe the role and value of structured risk assessment instruments in guiding case management and treatment planning
4) Demonstrate the practical application of risk assessment instruments in professional practice
5) Explain how the assessment process allows informed estimations of sexual risk
6) Integrate the 2017 ATSA adolescent guidelines into the evaluation of children and adolescents with sexually problematic behaviors

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Phil Rich, EdD, LICSW) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability (Phil Rich, EdD, LICSW) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Analyze contemporary approaches to assessing sexual risk among juveniles” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Evaluate the strengths and limitations inherent in the risk assessment process” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Describe the role and value of structured risk assessment instruments in guiding case management and treatment planning” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Demonstrate the practical application of risk assessment instruments in professional practice” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Explain how the assessment process allows informed estimations of sexual risk” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.6. Would you agree that learning objective #6 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Integrate the 2017 ATSA adolescent guidelines into the evaluation of children and adolescents with sexually problematic behaviors” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s (Phil Rich, EdD, LICSW) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all