Training Evaluation: Adolescent Sex Offending Perpetration – Module 1

(NJ-Part 01 Module 1) Training Evaluation – Adolescent Sex Offending Perpetration

Training Name: Adolescent Sex Offending Perpetration – Module 1

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1. Explain why community-based treatment is generally preferred over residential placement for adolescents with problematic sexual behaviors, including the problem of skills failing to transfer from institutional settings.
2. Describe why punishment alone rarely changes adolescent behavior, distinguishing between shame and guilt as responses to consequences.
3. Apply the risk, need, and responsivity principles to case supervision, including the danger of over-treating low-risk youth.
4. Compare adolescents who have engaged in sexually abusive behavior with other justice-involved teens, identifying which characteristics differ (such as histories of sexual victimization and social isolation) and which do not (such as attitudes toward women).
5. Summarize the research on desistance and treatment outcomes, including the finding that the vast majority of adolescents who have sexually abused do not continue this behavior into adulthood.

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (David Prescott, LICSW, ATSA-F) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability (David Prescott, LICSW, ATSA-F) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Explain why community-based treatment is generally preferred over residential placement for adolescents with problematic sexual behaviors, including the problem of skills failing to transfer from institutional settings.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Describe why punishment alone rarely changes adolescent behavior, distinguishing between shame and guilt as responses to consequences.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Apply the risk, need, and responsivity principles to case supervision, including the danger of over-treating low-risk youth.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Compare adolescents who have engaged in sexually abusive behavior with other justice-involved teens, identifying which characteristics differ (such as histories of sexual victimization and social isolation) and which do not (such as attitudes toward women).” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Summarize the research on desistance and treatment outcomes, including the finding that the vast majority of adolescents who have sexually abused do not continue this behavior into adulthood. ” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s (David Prescott, LICSW, ATSA-F) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all