Training Evaluation: Creating High-Functioning Treatment Groups for Adults Who Have Sexually Abused (OT188-A)

(OT188-A) Evaluation – Creating High-Functioning Treatment Groups for Adults Who Have Sexually Abused

Training Evaluation: Creating High-Functioning Treatment Groups for Adults Who Have Sexually Abused

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1. Describe the history of group treatment interventions
2. Explain essential elements of effective groups, such as cohesion and the therapeutic alliance
3. Define and implement an effective structure for group treatment sessions
4. Describe research studies supporting group treatment effectiveness
5. Implement techniques for selecting members of groups
6. Explain how clinician characteristics can help or hinder a group

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Steven Sawyer, MSSW, LICSW, ATSA-F) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability (Steven Sawyer, MSSW, LICSW, ATSA-F) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Describe the history of group treatment interventions” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Explain essential elements of effective groups, such as cohesion and the therapeutic alliance” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Define and implement an effective structure for group treatment sessions” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Describe research studies supporting group treatment effectiveness” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Implement techniques for selecting members of groups” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.6. Would you agree that learning objective #6 was met?
Learning Objective #6: “Explain how clinician characteristics can help or hinder a group” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s (Steven Sawyer, MSSW, LICSW, ATSA-F) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all