Training Evaluation: Culturally Informed Work: Fostering Engagement and Resilience in Treatment

(OT264) Training Evaluation: Culturally Informed Work: Fostering Engagement and Resilience in Treatment

Training Name: Culturally Informed Work: Fostering Engagement and Resilience in Treatment

Date: January 24, 2025

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Integrate cultural factors into treatment discussions and interventions with clients.
2) Describe the concept of intersectionality and its influence on clients’ lived experiences.
3) Explain cultural betrayal trauma theory and its relevance to client care.
4) Examine how assessment measures can unintentionally pathologize clients of color and identify strategies to mitigate this bias.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Integrate cultural factors into treatment discussions and interventions with clients.” = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Describe the concept of intersectionality and its influence on clients’ lived experiences.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Explain cultural betrayal trauma theory and its relevance to client care.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Examine how assessment measures can unintentionally pathologize clients of color and identify strategies to mitigate this bias.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all