Training Evaluation: The Intervention Intersection: Human Trafficking and Sexual Offending


(OT121-A) Evaluation – The Intervention Intersection: Human Trafficking and Sexual Offending

Course Name: The Intervention Intersection: Human Trafficking and Sexual Offending

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be better able to:
1) List and describe two major types of trafficking.
2) Describe common risk factors trafficking victims possess.
3) Discuss the implications of trafficking on sexual offense specific assessment and treatment.
4) Identify the psychological characteristics and criminogenic risk/need factors for perpetrators of domestic sex trafficking.
5) Implement strategies for the appropriate assessment, treatment and management of perpetrators of domestic sex trafficking.
6) Describe the federal definition of human trafficking and implications for professionals.
7) Identify how human trafficking intersects with other forms of sexual offending.
8) Describe how human trafficking can result in “trauma bonds” between victim and trafficker.

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5.1. Rate the first instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Katherine Gomez) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.2. Rate the second instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Katie Gotch) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.1. Rate the first instructor’s teaching ability (Katherine Gomez) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.2. Rate the second instructor’s teaching ability (Katie Gotch) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “List and describe two major types of trafficking,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Describe common risk factors trafficking victims possess,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Discuss the implications of trafficking on sexual offense specific assessment and treatment,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Identify the psychological characteristics and criminogenic risk/need factors for perpetrators of domestic sex trafficking,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Implement strategies for the appropriate assessment, treatment and management of perpetrators of domestic sex trafficking,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.6. Would you agree that learning objective #6 was met?
Learning Objective #6: “Describe the federal definition of human trafficking and implications for professionals,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.7. Would you agree that learning objective #7 was met?
Learning Objective #7: “Identify how human trafficking intersects with other forms of sexual offending,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.8. Would you agree that learning objective #8 was met?
Learning Objective #8: “Describe how human trafficking can result in “trauma bonds” between victim and trafficker,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor(s) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all