Training Evaluation: RNR and the Power of Preparation and Motivation for Group-Based Treatment (OT130-A) (OT130-A) Evaluation – RNR and the Power of Preparation and Motivation for Group-Based Treatment Course Name: RNR and the Power of Preparation and Motivation for Group-Based Treatment Learning Objectives As a result of this training, participants will be better able to: 1) Apply methods for pre-treatment orientation and preparation for group-based treatment. 2) Describe research related to pre-treatment and motivational approaches in sex abuse specific treatment. 3) Use a client workbook into pre-treatment preparation that invites self-discovery of personal character strengths, (toxic) masculinity and gender stereotypes, cooperation, and receiving and giving help as well as enhancing motivation and openness to treatment change 4) Apply techniques for facilitating interpersonal interaction in the group for enhanced cohesion and treatment effectiveness. 5) Plan and implement group-based techniques for reducing defensiveness and facilitating social engagement. 6) Describe the application of the risk, need, and responsivity principles to group treatment. In order to receive NBCC credit, you must provide your name and email address. If you seek only APA credits, you have the option to remain anonymous. Please select your preference below: * Include name and email addressRemain anonymous and receive an APA approved certificate only Email * Last Name (as you’d like printed on your certificate) * First Name (as you’d like printed on your certificate) * License Number, if applicable (for identity verification purposes) Issuing state/province, if applicable Which of the following best describes you? * Select OnePsychologistSocial WorkerCounselorStudentNone of the above I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate. * I agree 1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little * 5 4 3 2 1 2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all * 5 4 3 2 1 4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all * 5 4 3 2 1 5.1 Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Jerry Jennings) * 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 5.2 Rate the second instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Steven Sawyer) * 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 6.1 Rate the first instructor’s teaching ability (Jerry Jennings) * 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 6.2 Rate the second instructor’s teaching ability (Steven Sawyer) * 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met? Learning Objective #1: “Apply methods for pre-treatment orientation and preparation for group-based treatment,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met? Learning Objective #2: “Describe research related to pre-treatment and motivational approaches in sex abuse specific treatment,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met? Learning Objective #3: “Use a client workbook into pre-treatment preparation that invites self-discovery of personal character strengths, (toxic) masculinity and gender stereotypes, cooperation, and receiving and giving help as well as enhancing motivation and openness to treatment change,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met? Learning Objective #4: “Apply techniques for facilitating interpersonal interaction in the group for enhanced cohesion and treatment effectiveness,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met? Learning Objective #5: “Plan and implement group-based techniques for reducing defensiveness and facilitating social engagement,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.6. Would you agree that learning objective #6 was met? Learning Objective #6: “Describe the application of the risk, need, and responsivity principles to group treatment,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all * 5 4 3 2 1 9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all * 5 4 3 2 1 N/A 12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult * 5 4 3 2 1 13. Rate the instructor(s) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all * 5 4 3 2 1 14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all * 5 4 3 2 1 15. How will the information from this program be useful to you in the future? * 16. What did the program (or presenter/s) do particularly well that helped you understand the material? * 17. What, if anything, could the program (or presenter/s) have done differently to help you understand the material better? * 18. About how long did it take you to complete this course (including completing this form)? * 19. OPTIONAL: How did you learn about this training? 20. OPTIONAL: What country are you from? 21. OPTIONAL: Do you have any additional thoughts or comments you’d like to share with us? Submit If you are human, leave this field blank. Δ
