Evaluation: Motivational Interviewing for Adolescents and Young Adults (ACE Approval)

(ACE Provider Status) Training Evaluation: Motivational Interviewing for Adolescents and Young Adults: Style, Skills, & 4th Edition Insights for Addressing Sexual Offending Behaviors

Course Name: Motivational Interviewing for Adolescents and Young Adults: Style, Skills, & 4th Edition Insights for Addressing Sexual Offending Behaviors

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be better able to:
1) Identify recent changes outlined in the 4th edition of the primary motivational interviewing book.
2) Demonstrate the four motivational interviewing micro-skills with adolescents and young adults who have sexually abused.
3) Analyze the four processes that make up MI, demonstrating a thorough understanding of their interconnected roles in the MI framework.
4) Develop and apply techniques for eliciting “change talk” among adolescents and young adults with a history of sexual offending behaviors.

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (David Prescott, LICSW) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability (David Prescott, LICSW) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Identify recent changes outlined in the 4th edition of the primary motivational interviewing book.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Demonstrate the four motivational interviewing micro-skills with adolescents and young adults who have sexually abused.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Analyze the four processes that make up MI, demonstrating a thorough understanding of their interconnected roles in the MI framework.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Develop and apply techniques for eliciting “change talk” among adolescents and young adults with a history of sexual offending behaviors.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s (David Prescott, LICSW) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all