Training Evaluation: Utilizing Strengths-Based Interventions: Ending Harmful Sexual Behaviors


(OT178-A) Evaluation – Utilizing Strengths-Based Interventions: Ending Harmful Sexual Behavior

Course Name: Utilizing Strengths-Based Interventions: Ending Harmful Sexual Behaviors by Promoting Healthy, Prosocial Lives

Learning Objectives

1) Describe what a strengths-based approach is
2) Plan and implement interventions for forming trusting, positive relationships with youth and adult clients
3) Plan and implement interventions that promote hope within clients and providers
4) Utilize solution-focused interview questions
5) Explain the difference between an approach goal vs. an avoidant goal.
6) Describe protective factors commonly associated with resilience in youth and adults
7) Describe primary prevention strategies including components of safe, stable, nurturing relationships.

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Kevin M. Powell, Ph.D.) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s (Kevin M. Powell, Ph.D.) teaching ability 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Describe what a strengths-based approach is.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Plan and implement interventions for forming trusting, positive relationships with youth and adult clients . ” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Plan and implement interventions that promote hope within clients and providers.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Utilize solution-focused interview questions.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Explain the difference between an approach goal vs. an avoidant goal.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.6. Would you agree that learning objective #6 was met?
Learning Objective #6: “Describe protective factors commonly associated with resilience in youth and adults.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.7. Would you agree that learning objective #7 was met?
Learning Objective #7: “Describe primary prevention strategies including components of safe, stable, nurturing relationships.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor (Kevin M. Powell, Ph.D.) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all