Training Evaluation: Treating Individuals at High Risk of Sexual Re-Offense

(OT190-A) Evaluation – Treating Individuals at High Risk of Sexual Re-Offense

Course Name: Treating Individuals at High Risk of Sexual Re-Offense

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Apply specific components of the Integrated Risk Assessment and Treatment System (IRATS) Model in institutional or community settings
2) Describe various methods of enhancing therapeutic rapport with clients presenting at different risk levels
3) Integrate treatment for severe mental illness with treatment for sexual offending
4) Explain the role of substance and alcohol use in sexual offending
5) Explain the role of abuse-related sexual interests in offending

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5.1. Rate the first instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Jeffrey Abracen, Ph.D.) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.2. Rate the second instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Jan Looman Ph.D. C. Pysch.) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.1. Rate the first instructor’s teaching ability (Jeffrey Abracen, Ph.D.) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.2. Rate the second instructor’s teaching ability (Jan Looman Ph.D. C. Pysch.) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Apply specific components of the Integrated Risk Assessment and Treatment System (IRATS) Model in institutional or community settings.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Describe various methods of enhancing therapeutic rapport with clients presenting at different risk levels.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Integrate treatment for severe mental illness with treatment for sexual offending.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Explain the role of substance and alcohol use in sexual offending.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Explain the role of abuse-related sexual interests in offending.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the first presenter’s (Jeffrey Abracen, Ph.D.) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all
14. Rate the second presenter’s (Jan Looman Ph.D. C. Pysch.) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all
15. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all