Training Evaluation: Supervision, Screen Time, and Safety: Community Management

(NOT167-A) Evaluation – Supervision, Screen Time, and Safety: Community Management

Training Name: Supervision, Screen Time, and Safety: Community Management of Individuals with CSAM-Only Offenses

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1. Explain how clients who commit CSAM offenses differ in terms of risk from clients who commit contact sexual offenses.
2. Discuss the unique needs of clients who commit CSAM offenses.
3. Implement appropriate supervision strategies for clients who commit CSAM offenses.
4. Implement skills-based interventions to use with clients who commit CSAM offenses.
5. Describe how skills from Motivational Interviewing can inform supervision and practice with individuals who have sexually abused.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all
4. How useful was the content of this program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor(s) knowledge and expertise of the subject 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor(s) teaching ability 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
8. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
9. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
10. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
11. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all