Training Evaluation: How Risk/Need Assessment Informs and Enhances Case Planning

(OT232-A) Training Evaluation: How Risk/Need Assessment Informs and Enhances Case Planning

Course Name: How Risk/Need Assessment Informs and Enhances Case Planning

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be better able to:
1) Describe the different approaches to risk assessment and varying types of risk assessment tools.
2) Explain the bio-psycho-social model of offending and the importance of assessing psychopathy within the risk assessment process.
3) Describe the core components of risk assessment.
4) Identify how adverse childhood experiences, trauma, and protective factors affect risk assessment.
5) Apply risk assessment protocols appropriately to special populations (for example, females and people with intellectual disabilities).
6) Integrate risk assessment within case/treatment/risk management plans.

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Katherine Gotch, LPC, CCSOT, ATSA-F) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability (Katherine Gotch, LPC, CCSOT, ATSA-F) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Describe the different approaches to risk assessment and varying types of risk assessment tools.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Explain the bio-psycho-social model of offending and the importance of assessing psychopathy within the risk assessment process.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Describe the core components of risk assessment.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Identify how adverse childhood experiences, trauma, and protective factors affect risk assessment.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Apply risk assessment protocols appropriately to special populations (for example, females and people with intellectual disabilities).” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.6. Would you agree that learning objective #6 was met?
Learning Objective #6: “Integrate risk assessment within case/treatment/risk management plans.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s (Katherine Gotch, LPC, CCSOT, ATSA-F) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all