Training Evaluation: Fundamentals of Sex Offense-Specific Treatment

(OT231-A) Training Evaluation: Fundamentals of Sex Offense-Specific Treatment

Course Name: Fundamentals of Sex Offense-Specific Treatment

Learning Objectives

As a result of attending this training, participants will be better able to:
1) Select therapeutic interventions that specifically target relevant dynamic risk factors/treatment needs.
2) Apply information from risk assessments in selecting specific therapeutic interventions.
3) Demonstrate an empirically-informed level of treatment intensity/dosage for each client.
4) Describe a broad range of interventions available to clinicians working with clients with problematic sexual behavior.
5) Integrate effective adjunctive clinical interventions into sex offense specific treatment as a means of improving each client’s wellbeing and responsiveness to treatment.
6) Describe several techniques for helping clients to manage their sexual impulses and arousal.

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Bud Ballinger, PhD) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability (Bud Ballinger, PhD) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Select therapeutic interventions that specifically target relevant dynamic risk factors/treatment needs.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Apply information from risk assessments in selecting specific therapeutic interventions.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Demonstrate an empirically-informed level of treatment intensity/dosage for each client.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Describe a broad range of interventions available to clinicians working with clients with problematic sexual behavior.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Integrate effective adjunctive clinical interventions into sex offense specific treatment as a means of improving each client’s wellbeing and responsiveness to treatment.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.6. Would you agree that learning objective #6 was met?
Learning Objective #6: “Describe several techniques for helping clients to manage their sexual impulses and arousal.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s (Bud Ballinger, PhD) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all