Training Evaluation: Evaluating and Writing Reports on Adults Who Have Sexually Offended

(OT229-A) Evaluating and Writing Reports on Adults Who Have Sexually Offended

Course Name: Evaluating and Writing Reports on Adults Who Have Sexually Offended

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Describe the ATSA best practices for conducting adult psychosexual evaluations.
2) Identify different types of referral questions associated with psychosexual evaluations.
3) Explain the unique challenges associated with different types of adult psychosexual evaluations.
4) Describe the basic components of the written report.
5) Utilize strategies for maintaining objectivity and navigating common ethical situations that arise in the evaluation process.

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5.1 Rate the first instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Amy Griffith, PhD, LP) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.2 Rate the second instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Seth Wescott, LMLP) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.1 Rate the first instructor’s teaching ability (Amy Griffith, PhD, LP) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.2 Rate the second instructor’s teaching ability (Seth Wescott, LMLP) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Describe the ATSA best practices for conducting adult psychosexual evaluations.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Identify different types of referral questions associated with psychosexual evaluations.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Explain the unique challenges associated with different types of adult psychosexual evaluations.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Describe the basic components of the written report.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Utilize strategies for maintaining objectivity and navigating common ethical situations that arise in the evaluation process.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the first instructor’s (Amy Griffith, PhD, LP) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive
14. Rate the second instructor’s (Seth Wescott, LMLP) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive
15. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all