Training Evaluation: Community Management of People Who Have Sexually Abused and the Challenges of Working with Special-Needs Clients

(OT234-A) Training Evaluation: Community Management of People Who Have Sexually Abused

Course Name: Community Management of People Who Have Sexually Abused

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be better able to:

1) Critique historical approaches to manage risk in the community.
2) Describe current models for community management of persons who have sexually offended.
3) Explain core components of effective community supervision.
4) Critique measures of assessing risk and need in clients with special needs.
5) Describe an applied behavioral analytic approach to clients with special needs.
6) Explain how traditional approaches often don’t adhere to the responsivity principle of effective correctional treatment.

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Robin Wilson, PhD, ABPP) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability (Robin Wilson, PhD, ABPP) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Critique historical approaches to manage risk in the community.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Describe current models for community management of persons who have sexually offended.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Explain core components of effective community supervision.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Critique measures of assessing risk and need in clients with special needs.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Describe an applied behavioral analytic approach to clients with special needs.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.6. Would you agree that learning objective #6 was met?
Learning Objective #6: “Explain how traditional approaches often don’t adhere to the responsivity principle of effective correctional treatment.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s (Robin Wilson, PhD, ABPP) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all