Evaluation Form: Addressing Sexual Abuse Within the Sibling Relationship OT202-A

(OT202-A) Evaluation – Addressing Sexual Abuse Within the Sibling Relationship

Course Name: Addressing Sexual Abuse Within the Sibling Relationship

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Describe a rationale for addressing sexual abuse within the sibling relationship.
2) Evaluate readiness for the commencement of conjoint sibling intervention.
3) Plan an initial session for the commencement of therapeutic contact.
4) Identify ways to support children and parents in being able to communicate and explore their thoughts and feelings about the sexual abuse.
5) Integrate exploration of family and sibling relationships that are problematic and healthy.
6) Develop safety plans with children and parents that focus on expectations regarding privacy, play, and communication.

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Linda Valenta, MSW) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability (Linda Valenta, MSW) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Describe a rationale for addressing sexual abuse within the sibling relationship.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Evaluate readiness for the commencement of conjoint sibling intervention.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Plan an initial session for the commencement of therapeutic contact.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Identify ways to support children and parents in being able to communicate and explore their thoughts and feelings about the sexual abuse.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Integrate exploration of family and sibling relationships that are problematic and healthy.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.6. Would you agree that learning objective #6 was met?
Learning Objective #6: “Develop safety plans with children and parents which focus on expectation around privacy, play and communication.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the presenter’s (Linda Valenta, MSW) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all