Training Evaluation: Digital Birds & Bees: Talking Tech, Teens, & Sex (OT148-A)


(OT148-A) Evaluation – Digital Birds & Bees: Talking Tech, Teens, & Sex

Course Name: Course Name: Digital Birds and Bees: Talking Tech, Teens, & Sex

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be better able to:
1) Describe risky sexual digital content that adolescents are routinely exposed to
2) Explain how such content can affect adolescents’ sexual understanding
3) Apply a collaborative approach in working with adolescents to explore technology, teenagers, and sex with adolescent clients
4) Apply a framework for a triage response to problematic use of technology
5) Identify key resources that can help in assessing and treating youth who have experienced or caused harm via their online behavior
2) Describe a framework of ethical guidelines to assure professionalism while employing traditional, indigenous-inspired healing methods.
3) Identify the altered states that occur in various religious and healing practices.
4) Identify at least four factors that have produced helpful placebo effects.
5) Identify elements of treatment that have a nocebo effect and skills needed to prevent them
6) Describe how quaternary prevention can focus on the prevention of harm through well-intended interventions
7) Provide plain-speaking and viable definitions of soul, medicine, and spirit.

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Describe risky sexual digital content that adolescents are routinely exposed to,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Explain how such content can affect adolescents’ sexual understanding,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Apply a collaborative approach in working with adolescents to explore technology, teenagers, and sex with adolescent clients,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Apply a framework for a triage response to problematic use of technology,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Identify key resources that can help in assessing and treating youth who have experienced or caused harm via their online behavior,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor(s) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all