Training Evaluation: Conducting Sexual Abuser Risk of Sexual Harm to Children Assessments Using the ROSAC (OT165-A) Evaluation – Conducting Sexual Abuser Risk of Sexual Harm to Children Assessments Using the ROSAC Course Name: Conducting Sexual Abuser Risk of Sexual Harm to Children Assessments Using the ROSAC Learning Objectives As a result of this training, participants will be able to: 1) Describe the theoretical and research basis for the ROSAC 2) Describe how the ROSAC is constructed and scored 3) Score and use the ROSAC to make risk determinations 4) Use ROSAC risk to develop safety plans 5) Describe the advantages of using collaborative ROSAC assessment approaches 6) Identify the limitations of the ROSAC If you seek psychology credit you have the option to remain anonymous. If you seek social work credit you must provide your contact information. Please select your preference below: * Include name and email addressRemain anonymous and receive an APA approved certificate only Email * Last Name (as you’d like printed on your certificate) * First Name (as you’d like printed on your certificate) * License Number, if applicable (for identity verification purposes) Issuing state/province, if applicable Which of the following best describes you? * Select OnePsychologistSocial WorkerCounselorStudentNone of the above I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate. * I agree 1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little * 5 4 3 2 1 2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all * 5 4 3 2 1 4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all * 5 4 3 2 1 5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met? Learning Objective #1: “Describe the theoretical and research basis for the ROSAC .” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met? Learning Objective #2: “Describe how the ROSAC is constructed and scored.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met? Learning Objective #3: “Score and use the ROSAC to make risk determinations .” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met? Learning Objective #4: “Use ROSAC risk to develop safety plans.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met? Learning Objective #5: “Describe the advantages of using collaborative ROSAC assessment approaches.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.6. Would you agree that learning objective #6 was met? Learning Objective #6: “Identify the limitations of the ROSAC. ” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all * 5 4 3 2 1 9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 N/A 12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult * 5 4 3 2 1 13. Rate the instructor(s) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all * 5 4 3 2 1 14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all * 5 4 3 2 1 15. How will the information from this program be useful to you in the future? * 16. What did the program (or presenter/s) do particularly well that helped you understand the material? * 17. What, if anything, could the program (or presenter/s) have done differently to help you understand the material better? * 18. About how long did it take you to complete this course (including completing this form)? * 19. OPTIONAL: How did you learn about this training? 20. OPTIONAL: Do you have any additional thoughts or comments you’d like to share with us? Submit If you are human, leave this field blank. Δ
