Training Evaluation: Adolescent Sex Offending Perpetration – Module 3


(NJ-Part 01 Module 3) Training Evaluation – Adolescent Sex Offending Perpetration – Module 3

Training Name: Adolescent Sex Offending Perpetration – Module 3

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1. Define professional boundaries in terms of being both protected and connected, and explain why both are required for the safety of everyone involved.
2. Describe the components of effective treatment, including assessment-driven programming, the SOAP framework (Stable, Occupied, Accountable, Plan), and disclosure as a running start into a better life rather than an endpoint.
3. Summarize the research showing that punishment on its own does not reduce reoffending risk, and identify what effective treatment requires instead.
4. Define ambivalence as competing motivations for and against change, and apply tools such as options menus and the importance/confidence scale to explore it.
5. Apply core motivational interviewing skills, including its spirit (partnership, acceptance, compassion, empowerment), the four tasks, and responding to change talk and sustain talk.

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (David Prescott, LICSW, ATSA-F) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability (David Prescott, LICSW, ATSA-F) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Define professional boundaries in terms of being both protected and connected, and explain why both are required for the safety of everyone involved.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Describe the components of effective treatment, including assessment-driven programming, the SOAP framework (Stable, Occupied, Accountable, Plan), and disclosure as a running start into a better life rather than an endpoint.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Summarize the research showing that punishment on its own does not reduce reoffending risk, and identify what effective treatment requires instead.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Define ambivalence as competing motivations for and against change, and apply tools such as options menus and the importance/confidence scale to explore it.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Apply core motivational interviewing skills, including its spirit (partnership, acceptance, compassion, empowerment), the four tasks, and responding to change talk and sustain talk.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s (David Prescott, LICSW, ATSA-F) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all