Training Evaluation: Talking About Sex in Sexual Offense Treatment: Practical Approaches for Professionals

(NOT133-A) Evaluation – Talking About Sex in Sexual Offense Treatment: Practical Approaches for Professionals

Training Name: Talking About Sex in Sexual Offense Treatment: Practical Approaches for Professionals

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Explain why SOTP treatment providers need to talk about sex and why it’s difficult.
2) Describe techniques for how to talk about sex in various contexts of sexual offense treatment.
3) Initiate discussions about client sexual attractions and provider reactions when discussing sex in sexual offense treatment.
4) Use diverse techniques for discussing sex and sexuality.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all
4. How useful was the content of this program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s (Nikole Nassen, PhD) knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s (Nikole Nassen, PhD) teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
8. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
9. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
10. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
11. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all